
The telecoms regulator has this morning opened a new investigation into BT, which will examine whether the information they provided in relation to a range of data – concerning the experience of customers who have entered into an agreement or placed an order for fixed phone and broadband services from EE and Plusnet – was accurate.
Ofcom currently has various information gathering powers to help them assess, monitor and govern the market. Naturally, communication providers are generally required to provide information, in a reasonable period of time, when responding to such requests. Crucially such providers are also required to ensure that the information they supply is accurate, to avoid misleading the regulator.
In this case the regulator issued several such requests to BT’s entities, specifically Plusnet and EE, under Section 137A of the Communications Act 2003 on 7th December 2023. The requests required the provision of information (i.e. a range of data concerning the experience of customers who have entered into an agreement or placed an order for fixed phone and broadband services) to inform the 2025 Comparing Customer Service Report.
Advertisement
However, Ofcom indicates that “some” of BT entities may not have complied with the requirements, due to issues of accuracy and completeness.
Ofcom’s statutory information requests play a key part in Ofcom’s work and the information gathered from these requests informs how Ofcom carries out its statutory functions as a regulator. It is therefore essential that stakeholders provide accurate and complete information in a timely fashion. Where Ofcom has reasonable grounds for believing that a contravention of a requirement imposed under section 137A of the Act has occurred or is occurring, Ofcom may take enforcement action under section 138 of the Act.
The available evidence suggests the responses of some BT entities may not have complied with certain requirements imposed under section 137A, in that some of the information provided in response to the Notices may not have been complete and/or accurate. Ofcom’s investigation will examine whether there are reasonable grounds for believing BT has failed to comply with its statutory duties in relation to Ofcom’s information requests.
We will gather further information and publish an update to our investigation in due course.
Such investigations tend to be quite long-winded affairs and often only result in relatively small to modest fines, as well as a need for improvements in the operator’s processes and systems. For example, in 2018 the regulator fined BT £70k for similar issues (here) and in 2021 they were hit with another such fine of £42.5k (here), while O2 was fined £150k in 2021 (here).
We suspect something similar could be the outcome for this case, unless the issue is deemed to be more serious.
Advertisement
Been with orange T-Mobile Plusnet now EE for many years and my £10 a month mobile has gone up 25% to £12.50. very annoyed with this as when I negotiated the 24 month new contract was never told it would be a 25% increase. Told me £195 to cancel yesterday. Far more than the cost of living percentage. Contacted them at head office but said it was in their terms and conditions. So much for ofcoms pounds and pence advice to providers.
It was clear from the offset that the pounds and pence model was potentially an absolute rip off. The only people maybe better off are those on really expensive plans but for someone on a budget SIM only deal it is an absolute rip off. Of course the networks took full advantage of this. It’s almost like they handed OFCOM a backhander to put this through.
The people complaining about the CPI + 3.9% increase wanted this REMOVED not changed. The networks can do it but they won’t. It’s almost like collusion, they are all setting their prices as high as they possibly can. They should either offer shorter contracts or price the contracts where the increase is factored into the monthly cost from the start.